GintiCalcEvery calculation

A11yScope

Accessibility Remediation Cost Calculator

Turn a vague 'we should fix accessibility' into a scoped budget and timeline — by page template, not by page.

Cost to remediate accessibility issues across a site

Cost scales with templates times issues per template times hours per issue. Rows add 30% for testing and retesting, at $95 an hour unless noted.

TemplatesIssues eachHours per issueRateTotal issuesTotal hoursTotal costPer template
10121.5$95120234$22,230$2,223
25121.5$95300585$55,575$2,223
50121.5$956001,170$111,150$2,223
25201.5$95500975$92,625$3,705
25121.5$150300585$87,750$3,510
25123$953001,170$111,150$4,446

Templates, not pages, are the unit that matters: fixing a header component once fixes it everywhere it appears. Hours per issue varies enormously, from minutes for a missing alt attribute to days for an inaccessible custom widget, so the last row is closer to reality for legacy interfaces.

An accessibility remediation cost calculator estimates the effort and budget required to fix the accessibility problems on a website, so teams can plan and scope the work before committing to a fixed quote. Rather than counting every individual page, it works at the level of page templates — the reusable layouts (home, product, article, checkout, account) that generate the hundreds or thousands of pages a site actually serves. Because a single template fix propagates across every page built from it, template count is a far better basis for estimating real effort than raw page count.

The model multiplies your number of unique templates by the average number of accessibility issues found per template to get a total issue count. That total is multiplied by the average time it takes a developer to fix one issue — some fixes, like adding alt text or a form label, take minutes, while others, like rebuilding a custom dropdown for full keyboard and screen-reader support, take hours, so the average smooths across the mix. The resulting base hours are then increased by a testing and retest overhead, because real remediation is never write-once: every fix has to be verified with automated tools and manual assistive-technology testing, and a meaningful share of fixes fail retest and need a second pass. Multiplying the adjusted hours by a blended hourly rate produces the total cost, which is also broken down per template so you can prioritize the highest-traffic or highest-risk layouts first.

Two cautions matter. First, this is an estimate of engineering effort, not a compliance guarantee — it makes no claim that the result will satisfy WCAG, the ADA, or the European EN 301 549 standard, all of which require judgment and testing beyond a page count. Second, the input that moves the number most is issues per template, which only a real automated-plus-manual audit can pin down; treat the default as a placeholder until you have audit data. Used with those caveats, the calculator turns an open-ended remediation project into a scoped, defensible budget and timeline you can take to stakeholders.

Why template count beats page count

A fix applied to a template automatically covers every page generated from it, so real remediation effort scales with the number of unique templates, not the number of URLs. A 5,000-page site might run on just 15-20 templates. Estimating by page would overstate the work by orders of magnitude — always scope accessibility remediation at the template level.

Retest overhead is not optional

Every accessibility fix has to be re-verified with both automated scanners and manual assistive-technology testing (screen readers, keyboard-only navigation), and a real share of fixes fail on first retest and need a second pass. That's why this calculator adds a testing overhead on top of raw fix time — leaving it out is the most common way remediation estimates come in far too low.

Frequently asked questions

My site has 20 templates averaging 10 issues each — what's the remediation budget?

That's 200 issues. At 1.5 hours per issue that's 300 base hours; adding a 40% testing/retest overhead brings it to 420 hours. At a $90 blended rate, roughly $37,800 — about $1,890 per template. Fix your highest-traffic templates first.

What's a realistic 'issues per template' number?

It varies enormously with how the site was built. A modern component-based site on an accessible design system might have 3-6 issues per template; an older bespoke site full of custom widgets can have 20-40. Only an automated-plus-manual audit gives a reliable figure — treat the default as a placeholder.

Does this tell me if my site is ADA or WCAG compliant?

No. This estimates remediation effort and cost only. Legal compliance with the ADA, WCAG 2.2, or EN 301 549 requires an actual audit and expert judgment about conformance, which no calculator can determine. Use this to budget the work, not to certify the outcome.

How is this different from the freelance rate or meeting cost calculators?

Those price a single person's time or a single meeting. This one scopes a whole remediation project — combining issue volume, per-issue fix time, and a testing overhead into a total budget and a per-template breakdown you can prioritize and phase.

Related Business calculators

You might also like

Last updated: August 25, 2026